News Alert



Thousands of graduates from across Pakistan try their luck every year in the competitive examination (CE), also known as Central Superior Service (CSS) exam, conducted by the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC). CSS is considered the most prestigious exam in Pakistan as it opens, for successful aspirants, the doors to the country’s bureaucracy, or more rightly, the Civil Services of Pakistan. It has been, however, a sad fact that every year over 90 percent of the aspirants fail this exam – in other words their dream. The drastic decline in passing ratio in CSS exam during the recent years has exposed the quality of higher education in Pakistan. Experts say that the principal reason behind these declining percentages is that the institutions of higher education in Pakistan focus more on quantity rather than quality; increasing the number of institutions, research articles/papers published and PhDs with no quality is a manifestation of that. This is a big question mark on the standard of these, supposedly, seats of higher learning. Why these public- and private-sector universities are no longer producing big names like Dr Abdus Salam and Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan? This does not mean that students are not talented; they really are, but it is the education system that is not capable enough to polish their talents. This is a sad fact that no Pakistani university ranks among top 100 worldwide. Perhaps concentrating on fewer but quality universities would have a greater impact. The numbers game has to stop once and for all.

Annual percentage of successful candidates in CSS exam has been decreasing, according to the FPSC’s annual reports. It has been on a steep decline between 2002 and 2016; the passing percentage of the candidates in the written examination was 30 percent in 2002 while in 2017, the figure has plummeted to a mere 2.09 percent. According to the FPSC’s Annual Report 2016, the FPSC could only select 240 candidates for 285 seats that were open to candidates – perplexingly, no suitable candidates were found for the remaining number of seats. Observations in the 2016 report highlight the problematic trends within the examination process, the most apparent of which is the low quality of writing, a factor that has affected performances in all subjects. That is evident from the result of English Essay paper: only 24 percent 9,062 candidates of passed and among them only 31 candidates could get a score of 60 percent or more.

Another main reason behind this fiasco is candidates’ inclination toward ready-made study material; like notes, guides, etc. By resorting to these sources, candidates wrote what they had learned by heart. Rote-memorization has remained particularly problematic in Literature, History of India and Pakistan, and Public Administration papers. English language skills have also been declared poor generally, hampering candidates’ ability to answer questions effectively. Owing to an acute lack of analytical skills, most candidates could not attempt the questions regarding Women and Islam, in Islamic Studies paper; a vast majority of candidates failed to adequately consider contemporary issues regarding the veil and secularism in society. According to an examiner’s report, the level of aspirants in Islamic History and Culture paper was also mediocre, with only a superficial understanding of the subject demonstrated. Main dilemma in failure of CSS exam on the side of candidates has always remained that answers were neither proper nor precise.

Sorry you have no rights to view this Article/Post!
Please Login or Register to view the complete Article

To get full access EMAIL your username, Subscription Plan and email address at for details

SUBSCRIPTION PLANS Rs. 3300 for 1 year.


About Hassaan Bin Zubair

Author Image
The writer is a PhD Scholar (English Literature). He can be reached at:

Check Also

Profit & Loss

Profit and Loss

Written by: Asad Aziz on February 20, 2018. as Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *