fbpx

An Analysis of CE 2019 Result

competition_is_good_

An Analysis of

CE 2019 Result

WTI Team

Every year, after the result of Central Superior Services (CSS) examination is announced, there is a barrage of criticism against the system of examination and selection, based on some myths. This is unfair and counter-productive as well. It is unfair because criticism is not backed by any data and, therefore, the myths it leads to are ill-founded. It is counter-productive because it disheartens many candidates. The fact that criticism is itself not based on any substantive evidence makes the practice doubly counter-productive. With this background then, this article aims to show that the criticism is unfounded by dispelling the myths in a scientific manner, and to help the candidates by providing them an analysis of results through an investigative, qualitative and quantitative research.

Sorry you have no rights to view this Article/Post!
Please Login or Register to view the complete Article

To get full access EMAIL your username, Subscription Plan and email address at worldtimes07@gmail.com for details or Whatsapp on

0302 555 68 02

SUBSCRIPTION PLANS
Rs. 3500 for 1 year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *